There is a romance theme that I believe is kept in the closet. That theme is the “Fixer-Upper” hero.
One of the major problems in writing a romance is having a good reason why the hero (who is tall, dark, handsome, often rich, and always an experienced lover -- who puts the needs of the heroine first) is still available. And if available, why would the heroine have a chance at getting him when he is usually a “babe” magnet? Now, if the heroine is a “babe” herself, then where is the tension? Babes get men like that.
How do you get a better home than you can afford? You buy a “fixer-upper” and fix it and voila you’re living above your means within your means! Everyone wins!
In many romances the hunk-of-a-hero is available because he is defective and needs repair. Sometimes he just needs the love of a good woman. As mothers and caregivers women are experienced in this area.
The “fixer-upper” theme flows very naturally and is believable. However, while it may be an ideal theme from the authors’ POV, do women really want this kind of hero? Do “fixer-upper” heroes “crowd-out” healthy heroes?
Think about it. How many heroes have been "healthy" and how many heroes have been “fixer-uppers” in the last few novels you’ve read? This might tell you which you like best. Of course, I will notice this more because as a man, I don’t like to vicariously be a “messed-up” hero for a few hours until the heroine fixes me. This may be why I like “Marriage of Convenience” and “Stranded With” themes were both hero and heroine are often normal and the tension comes from the situation. What do you think? Do you like “fixer-upper” heroes better than normal heroes?
IMPORTANT: It is not wrong to like "fixer-upper" heroes. Some of these heroes are real heroes back from the war. The heroines in these stories are heroines in real life as well. The question is which do you perfer and do fans demand these "fixer-uppers" or are they author driven?
Please note: An Alpha-Male hero, who only needs to be tamed, is not defective he’s just more normal than the average guy.
Thanks,
Vince
“Romances are the emotional vitamins of the soul.” Vince






Ahem...Clearing my throat...
Don't be mad at me for saying this...But even in real life, most men are fixer uppers in one way or another. Its something that women are used to....
There's a country song...I have the CD, but the name of the artist (Chely Wright?) slips my mind called "I Got Him Ready for You." Its one woman telling another woman that she trained this guy to be the perfect boyfriend that he is today. Its a great song.
Laughter is an instant vacation- Milton Berle
re: fixer upper guys
This is a really interesting topic. I do think that some women are attracted to the fixer-upper type.
Part of it is that the hero needs the heroine--in real life, if you feel the man needs you, you think he's less likely to need you. For insecure types (which I'll admit I am sometimes--I'm speaking from experience here!) this is a big part of it.
Another part of it is that it reverses gender stereotypes--the woman can feel like she's helping or protecting the man in some way. It equalizes the relationship a bit. I think this is why I often like reading about fixer-upper heroes, because they're usually not alpha males (I generally don't like alpha male types).
And part of it is that perfection just isn't as interesting as a hero with a real background story. You pointed out the heroes who have returned from combat--a lot of women like reading about heroes. Similarly, cops and firemen (other hero-type men) in stories often have an issue from their past driving them. A dead family member, a murder they couldn't solve that's haunting them...
For me personally, I like the fixer uppers because those tend to be stronger stories (though I also sometimes enjoy the marriage of convenience and especially the "stranded with" stories you mentioned too) and because the men are more interesting and less likely to be totally arrogant the way some of the "normal" or "more normal than the average guy" (love your term!) types are.
re: fixer upper guys
Heh...replying to Vikki's post right above mine...most women are fixer uppers, too, I think. The majority of us carry scars from childhood or previous relationships. So I think the fixer uppers can feel a little more realistic.
I would rather think of the hero as needing "healing"
which in my mind is different than "fixing" ..... we are all imperfect but that does not mean we require fixing
I tend to be drawn to heros that have tortured pasts .. be it from a harsh upbringing or by some trauma ..... in these cases the heroine would aid in his emotional healing ... love heals a wounded soul
I equally enjoy reading books where it's the heroine that has the trauma to overcome .... there have been some truly beautiful love stories where the hero has brought the heroine's heart back to life and love .... one of my recent Susan Fox reads was one
I don't know ... maybe it is the same thing .... I'm just not fond of the word "fix" when it comes to the human equation ..... humans don't require fixing, God made us imperfect for a reason
also, shouldn't your question be "Do READERS Really Want 'Fixer-Upper' Heroes?" ?? .... I agree that women comprise the majority of romance readers but there is a significant percentage of men who read romance and write it as well .... why are you singling out only the women? ... are other male points of views on your questions not of value?
~~ KatherineT ~~ I'm a Harlequin Addict, and I'm proud of it!
~~ Quiet Canadians ~ 2008 Book Challenge Blog
Would this be...
the same as what many of us refer to as the "tortured hero"? I'm more into paranormal, but these are heroes like the ones Lori Devoti, JR Ward, etc tend to provide us with..... I've never really thought of them as "fixer uppers" and my social work background has me cringing a bit at that title!
But if it is tortured heroes you are referring to, then for once, yes, this is actually a theme I do tend to gravitate towards. But again, this is also a common hero type in paranormal, too.
And I have to just agree with Vikki here!
The D2K Paranormal Junkies 2008 Challenge
Fixer-uppers--love 'em or leave 'em
This is such an interesting topic, I'm not sure I have anything really new to add, but...
In real life people carry greater or lesser degrees of emotional baggage and there is a tendency for us to find others that have a similar amount of emotional baggage. That doesn't mean it will necessarily be the same baggage, but it will still be there. So from my point of view as long as there is some balance in the relationship (she's also a 'fixer-upper') I think the device will work well.
But if she is an emotionally, physically, mentally fine person why would she want the fixer-upper? I would start yelling at her to move on don't waste her time and I would then put the book down and not finish it.
The Presents line has that strong alpha male and often the woman is a weak, younger, submissive female. I have read some books that are well written, but I just really don't like that concept. For my taste there just isn't any balance in the relationship. Many times the male comes across as the "put together, has-all-his-ducks-in-a-row, guy" and she comes across as being very needy. In this case she is the "fixer-upper."
So, it really doesn't matter if it is the guy or the gal, if it is only one of them it doesn't work, but it works if the both can grow by knowing the other.
Nancy
re: fixer-upper heroes
That's a really good point, that the best stories (for me too at least) seem to be when the hero and heroine have the same amount (but different type) of emotional baggage.
Fixer-upper heroines...
I read a couple of stories last year that were part of the Special Edition line where the heroines were the ones returning from war wounded emotionally. I think one of them was Dancing in the Moonlight....I don't remember the other one but it was by the author that wrote Winning Dixie (great title). Those were two that were just as awesome as the military hero books that I love.
I've read a lot of books where the heroine was the one with the emotional issues. For example, heroines who are divorced typically carry a lot of baggage.The hero usually has to overcome his own misgivings and hers too.
Fixer-upper characters give the story a depth and allows us, the reader, to see them grow.
This is a super topic!
Laughter is an instant vacation- Milton Berle
more on fixer-uppers
I agree that fixer-uppers can give depth to the characters and can make them more real--it's just when one is ok and the other isn't that bothers me. The reason it bothers me is because there is a power imbalance and yes, I know that that can happen in relationships, it just doesn't work for me.
Nancy
Some Need Healing and Some Really Do Need to be Fixed.
Hi All:
These are such thoughtful answers I wanted to take some time to consider them before commenting.
Vikki: I have to admit when I wrote this I was thinking the same thing…what man doesn’t need to be fixed-up in some way? At least from a female POV. I can remember when I was in the military and we would all go out drinking and I couldn’t see one guy I’d want my sister to marry.
I can understand that the term “fixer-upper” is not the nicest term and it would be kinder to refer to a hero who needs “healing”. However, that would not be precise and it would not be what I meant.
“Fixer-upper” refers to men who do need to be fixed: they cannot commit, they are irresponsible, bad fathers, unfaithful, lazy, too critical, belittling, drink too much, selfish, deceitful, immature, angry, defensive, etc.
I am referring to the kind of men that friends, mothers, and psychologists warn infatuated women that “He Won’t Change”. The infatuated woman thinks that after they marry she will tweak the bad habits out of the man and he will be just right for her.
This is the “fixer-upper” I was thinking about. That is why I wanted to make an exception for the true hero who needs healing. The Donna Alward book that I reviewed, “The Soldier's Homecoming“ had an emotionally damaged war hero but I loved this book. I had the greatest respect for the heroine. I would love to see this book get an award.
Even in “The Soldier's Homecoming“ book you could say the heroine did “fix” him. She took the risks to get him to talk about the nightmares that he was keeping repressed. She withstood his outrages. She stayed with him and got a really good man. This is a very hard call to make.
There is a fine line between a worthy emotional problem and a fixer-upper who should “snap out of it” and get on with his life and stop brooding.
The reason I asked if women like “fixer-upper” heroes is because I think I know how men feel but whenever I think I know what women think, I am often wrong. Also men make up so little of the buying market that I don’t think they count in editorial decisions. Like in so many other areas I would expect that 10% to 20% of romance readers buy 80% of the books. And I would expect those hard core buyers are almost all women.
I also asked what women think because a defective hero may not annoy women as they probably don’t vicariously become the hero when reading the story. I just read a book where the hero was awful but the heroine wanted him anyway. Defected heroes bother me because if I get into a book, then I have to spend time as that hero. And if I don’t like living inside that hero’s head, then I can’t enjoy the book. A woman reading the same book knows in the end the hero is going to be cured and a prize for the heroine.
I believe there is a substantial difference between the male and female romance reading experience. In all these comments I really don’t find anything I disagree with.
Thanks for your posts.
Vince
“Romances are the emotional vitamins of the soul.” Vince
RE:"FIXER-UPPERS"
Everyone, regardless of gender, income, educational background, etc., has been "damaged" in some way during their lifetime. Perhaps when riding bikes with your mates, snitty comments were made about how much of your arse hung off your cycle seat while you were ariding . To the gathered Mates and Blokes, it was quite comical, but you, as the intended target of such pissy foolishness, were cut to the marrow with grief (presently you won't attend class reunions, 'fore you believe many of your Mates will discuss your "big butt").
Do you not think if such things have happened to you, they've also happened to your Blaze Flame?
FRICK THC PUBLIC -- they're NOT the ones in relationship with you. If they appear too wild about what you and your sweetie are up to -- they can go take a dive!
"I went to a FIGHT the other night...and a HOCKEY GAME broke out!! "
HockeyDET@comcast.net
I am referring to the kind
I am referring to the kind of men that friends, mothers, and
psychologists warn infatuated women that “He Won’t Change”. The
infatuated woman thinks that after they marry she will tweak the bad
habits out of the man and he will be just right for her.
This is the major problem I have with Presents heros. They make it seem that this kind of man CAN be changed.
"Perhaps what the average member of a group is capable of doesn't limit what a given individual can accomplish." -- Boston Globe, letter to the editor
March's Member of the Month!
Vince
I'm very, very flattered. I have to admit I read wayyy more blogs now that eharl has this feature because the topics jump out at me. And I find you talking about The Soldier's Homecoming.
If you knew the trouble Jonas gave me writing his story, you'd laugh. LOL. He wasn't an easy man for Shannyn OR me. :-)
Thank you so much for those words. They have made my day.
Donna
FALLING FOR MR DARK AND DANGEROUS, Romance, August 08, Aus/NZ Sept. 08
THE RANCHER'S RUNAWAY PRINCESS, Romance, January 09
http://www.donnaalward.com
http://www.donnaalward.blogspot.com
FF: Are Your Sure?
Hi FF:
"I am referring to the kind of men that friends, mothers, and
psychologists warn infatuated women that “He Won’t Change”. The infatuated woman thinks that after they marry she will tweak the bad habits out of the man and he will be just right for her." VincePlato
"This is the major problem I have with Presents heroes. They make it seem that this kind of man CAN be changed." Fake Frenchie
Are you sure? It is my impression that the Presents' heroines would be very disappointed if the Alpha Male heroes ever did change. Isn’t that one reason why Presents is such a popular line? So many Alpha Males have been tamed into dull but reliable men that women seek them out anew between the covers of a Presents romance? Isn't there a saying: "Be careful what you wish for, you may get it?"
Thanks,
Vince
“Romances are the emotional vitamins of the soul.” Vince
re: fixer-uppers
"I am referring to the kind of men that friends, mothers, and
psychologists warn infatuated women that 'He Won’t Change'."
Ohhh, I was definitely interpreting the term fixer-upper wrong, then. I hate that kind of hero, and it just makes me think the heroine is stupid.
Yes, Vince, I'm sure!
Because most women are hoping that they could be the one to "tame" that Alpha. Never gonna happen.
"Perhaps what the average member of a group is capable of doesn't limit what a given individual can accomplish." -- Boston Globe, letter to the editor
March's Member of the Month!
The Alpha debate
I have to go with FF here. And it may be because Women are from Venus....you get what I'm saying, right?
Why do you think women are attracted to Bad Boys? It's the same thing with Alphas. We want to be the ones to tame them. Same with wounded heroes...we want to be the ones to heal them. For some reason we want to fix them. Personally I think it comes down to a need to be needed, but that's just me and that's in very simplistic terms.
The problem with that is that by taming and/or healing, the men then lose some of the characteristics that attracted us to them in the first place. Which is why then that a lot of "good guys" really finish first not last when it comes to marriage. They are the ones that are marriage material.
But we still have that fantasy. And that's where the romance novel comes in, IMO!
Presents is not my favourite line either, because I do find the heroes frequently very uncompromising. But I do understand how many see the allure. Personally, I'm a bit like Anne Shirley in the movie version of Anne of Green Gables. "I wouldn't want a man who was truly wicked. Just that he COULD be, and wouldn't."
LOL
This is a GREAT discussion.
Donna
FALLING FOR MR DARK AND DANGEROUS, Romance, August 08, Aus/NZ Sept. 08
THE RANCHER'S RUNAWAY PRINCESS, Romance, January 09
http://www.donnaalward.com
http://www.donnaalward.blogspot.com
Thank you for clarifying "fixer-upper" .....
Thank you for clarifying “fixer-upper” ….. the men you are describing here, to me, are NOT heroes …. these men are brutes and cowards
A hero is a man who has an inner integrity …. he’s honourable and loyal … he may behave badly and perhaps with cruelty esp. to the heroine, however he’s not truly cruel at heart ….if the author does his / her job, the how and the why the hero is the way he is or behaves the way he does is explained … otherwise the man is unheroic
I say that the MEN you describe above are not desirable and have no place being described as heroes …. they are cads not worthy of the heroine
If a person has a nurturing nature, and I will agree this is a quality most women possess, then the person will be attracted to a hero that has vulnerabilities and may need help becoming a better man … remember heroes are already “good” men at heart, their women will make them “better” men ...... and if a person has a nurturing nature, they will also be drawn to heroines who may suffer from a tortured past, be it a harsh childhood or some sort of traumatic event
Now on the living vicariously through the hero or heroine … I don’t know about that … perhaps I’m a different sort of reader …
when I read a character driven book, I of course bring my own personal experiences with me … if the author is gifted, I can often empathize with the characters, both male and female regardless of age, race or circumstance …. If I do not have the personal experience to draw on to empathize, I can and do sympathize with characters …. or “relate” to …. I don’t think I’ve ever put myself into a character; made believe I’m that character … this may be the core difference between your reading experience and mine .... as I don't live vicariously through a character, I am free to "relate" to any gender of protangonist ... I'm not limiting my experience
to further explain "how" I read a book, I'll share again my reading experience as I described it last year of an Emma Darcy Harlequin Presents ......
When I read, I see the scenes in my head very much as if they were unfolding in front of me... perhaps like a movie .... I can feel the emotions of the characters and often will experience tears or laugh out loud .... but I've never imagined that I am one of the characters
as you've mentioned here the Presents alpha male in some of your comments above, I think perhaps you may find this discussion from the old eHarlequin community of interest .... The Care and Feeding of the Alpha Male a discussion with Presents author Kate Walker
~~ KatherineT ~~ I'm a Harlequin Addict, and I'm proud of it!
~~ Quiet Canadians ~ 2008 Book Challenge Blog
Whoopsie, that's Kate
Whoopsie, that's Kate Walker!
"Perhaps what the average member of a group is capable of doesn't limit what a given individual can accomplish." -- Boston Globe, letter to the editor
March's Member of the Month!
Whoopsie indeed!!!
Whoopsie indeed!!!
... thanks FF! ... I was just shopping earlier for another Kate's book and got that all confused! .... thanks so much! .... and you wondered why you were March's Member of the Month!
~~ KatherineT ~~ I'm a Harlequin Addict, and I'm proud of it!
~~ Quiet Canadians ~ 2008 Book Challenge Blog
Great rant about heroes vs
Great rant about heroes vs jerks, Katherine, I completely agree.
Can I
add a third me too to that, Lady A and Katherine?
The D2K Paranormal Junkies 2008 Challenge
Can You Really Not Slip Vacariously Into The Character?
Hi All:
I think there is some equivocation going on here with the word “hero”. In one sense of the word a “hero” is a man of honor. In Donna Alward’s book the hero, Jason, was damaged both in body and in mind in the war but he was a totally honorable man. He was a true hero. In another sense, a “hero” is anyone the author makes the hero. I agree the lead male character in a romance may be a jerk but that only makes the hero of that book is a jerk. He is still the hero.
I think you have a valid point about reading styles. I make an effort to vicarious be the hero in a story. That comes from decades of doing philosophy. If you really want to understand a philosopher’s work, you have to try and become that philosopher. Otherwise it is too easy to reject what the author is trying to say without making an honest attempt to see the other person’s POV.
How better to feel a romance than be one of the characters? Indeed, a good romance is a way to travel. When I read a Lucy Gordon book, I am back in Venice or elsewhere in Italy. I want to experience what the hero is experiencing not just read about it. If I’m reading a Cindy Dees book, I want to feel what it is like to land a jet fighter. I know what it is like to land a small private plane so I am highly interested in how a jet would feel. I want to be doing it not reading about it. If I just wanted to read about a topic or experience, I’ll read a non-fiction work. To read fiction like it was non-fiction would be like drinking decaffeinated coffee. At least it would to me.
I also find it amazing that you quoted from “The Italian’s Stolen Bride” a book which I really disliked from an author I usually enjoy. In this book the romance was over in the first third of the book and the rest of the book was spent trying to get the hero’s worthless parents to accept the heroine. This was not romance. This was a Dr. Phil show. I was very upset with the hero and wanted to tell him to take his bride and go have a life while telling his parents to get lost. That wasn’t a hard decision. I could not stand being that hero and was not happy with the book. So I think there really is something to your view about reading styles. I will have to spend more time thinking about what these reading styles mean to someone who is writing a romance.
These posts are excellent and very eye-opening. Thanks.
Vince
“Romances are the emotional vitamins of the soul.” Vince
as for my comments...
Vince, you should probably note that I don't consider myself a romance reader. No, this doesn't mean that I don't read or like romance as I obviously do read and enjoy romances. But I do not read specifically for the romance. Hence, why most of the books I read tend to be paranormal where the world building is important. I don't want to slip into the characters' roles; I want to read about a different world. It's also why I enjoy reading books about other cultures.
The D2K Paranormal Junkies 2008 Challenge
I will disagree ......
I will disagree ...... you are describing a male leading character ... this is not necessarily a "hero"
in a "Romance" the hero must be desireable .... he must have an inner core that is honourable .... the hero is always a "good man" ..... he's not a jerk .... he may behave badly due to circumstances or misconceptions .... this does not change the fact that the man has integrity ........ in a "Romance" the male lead cannot be a jerk and a hero .....
~~ KatherineT ~~ I'm a Harlequin Addict, and I'm proud of it!
~~ Quiet Canadians ~ 2008 Book Challenge Blog
Now it Makes Total Sense
Hi Debbie:
Now your comments make total sense to me. If you are interested in systems, such as world building, then it actually helps to remain outside the system so you can better see it. I read many SF books, probably 1000, years ago and I was always interested in the world building themes as opposed to the “Space Operas” which were just cowboy plots carried out in space. I liked C.S. Lewis and Robert Silverberg. Coincidently, I am reading my first paranormal in a long time right now: “Nevermore” and it’s really great. I will have to consult your paranormal reviews before my next purchase.
Thanks,
Vince
“Romances are the emotional vitamins of the soul.” Vince
Would You Say then that Some Romances Have no Hero?
Hi KatherineT:
I think that by your definition of “hero” there may be a few romance novels out there that have heroines but no heroes. Are the Alpha-male “heroes” that some readers don’t like in some Presents novels not really heroes? I’m not one of the critics. I really like Lucy Monroe’s alpha-heroes, for example.
Thanks,
Vince
“Romances are the emotional vitamins of the soul.” Vince
ah, the Alpha male .........
the "Alpha male" as presented in a Harlequin Presents is a positive character .... he may behave badly, and sometimes intentionally so .... his behaviour is explained by the author, and we learn that he is a "decent" man and he atones for his bad behaviour ..... alpha's are decisive and like to be in control of their worlds ... some people dislike a person who is sure of themselves or who like to impose their methods on others .... a decisive, in control hero is not a negative one .... and I find that the alpha heroes tend to have the strongest core, they are the most loyal and have a good heart
the men you are describing above, are negative characters and as such cannot be heroes ... and beyond that they are highly undesirable ...... bad fathers, unfaithful, lazy, selfish, deceitful, belittling ......... you will not find those attributes in a Presents alpha hero ..... nor I suspect in a Harlequin hero ... there is no honour in those attributes ... is there such a thing as a hero without honour?
some heroes may be wary to commit that is usually because of past betrayal .... heroes may be angry and defensive, that usually happens when the heroine threatens his emotional control and he has difficulty understanding this .... a hero may lie to protect those whom he holds dearest, but he does not have a "deceitful" nature ..... a hero may be prepared to do just about anything for his heroine, however he will never compromise his honour
as far as heroes that drink too much ... I've personally only encountered those in Historicals written quite a few years ago ..... I believe they were called "rakes" .... unless there were endearing qualities to the man, I don't recall liking him much ..... heroes may get drunk but that is not normal behaviour, and the behaviour is usually explained
please take a moment to read the article for which I posted the link above .... the discussion of the Alpha hero is very informative and lead by a master of the Presents alphas, Kate Walker .... I fear I will never have adequate words to help you understand what I mean
~~ KatherineT ~~ I'm a Harlequin Addict, and I'm proud of it!
~~ Quiet Canadians ~ 2008 Book Challenge Blog
Contradiction in terms
Kathy,
You say, "a hero may lie to protect those whom he holds dearest, but he does not have a "deceitful" nature."
I say this a mistaken impression. The adage, "If it smells like sh**, it probably is sh**." comes to mind. Many women see a guy treating other women (or people) badly, but somehow, once he is with them, think that he would never do that to them. And this is maybe true in the short term, as long the guy holds the gal in high esteem, or in other words, as long as he wants to be with the gal. However, as soon as he begins to get restless, he will revert to nature and begin treating her badly. The premise on which the reformed alpha is built is that he will never lose interest. I personally doubt the truth of this.
"Perhaps what the average member of a group is capable of doesn't limit what a given individual can accomplish." -- Boston Globe, letter to the editor
March's Member of the Month!
Hi FF .......
I think I understand what you are saying
yes, these guys exist and those women exist ..... and the woman may be the heroine before she's met the hero, and she's been hurt and now may be wary of any man's attentions ..... but the man you are describing is he the hero in a romance novel? ....I sure as heck don't want to read about him .... and I don't think I've encountered such a man as the hero
hmmm ... this is tough ... I'm not sure I follow ... I think of an alpha as a man who has a very strong sense of loyalty and desire to protect ... he feels passionately .... I have no trouble believing he can achieve an everlasting love, and therefore a HEA ....
I believe an alpha hero can have personal growth ... that he can come to recognize his own bad behaviour and feel remorse ... I do believe he can be redeemed
hmmm, my sentence ... "hero may lie to protect those whom he holds dearest, but he does not have a "deceitful" nature" ...... I don't find this to be a contradiction in terms ...... a mother will do just about anything to protect her child, including lie ... this does not make her a deceitful person ... she is protecting her own
FF, I see you will never embrace the "alpha hero" .... and that's okay ...... my dh happens to be one, and his heart is one of the best I know .... but he's always right!
.. LOL
~~ KatherineT ~~ I'm a Harlequin Addict, and I'm proud of it!
~~ Quiet Canadians ~ 2008 Book Challenge Blog
Well, I did say alpha hero,
Well, I did say alpha hero, but it could be another kind of hero. LOL I was thinking of the reformed rakes in many historicals, who would not settle down, who loved the "thrill of the hunt". And then they met the heroine and decide that they can in fact settle down.
But anyhoo, you're right. I will probably never like what I call an alpha hero, despite the wise words of Kate Walker, who writes some of the better ones.
"Perhaps what the average member of a group is capable of doesn't limit what a given individual can accomplish." -- Boston Globe, letter to the editor
March's Member of the Month!
A Hero at Heart ................
I know that we are not discussing "perfect" heroes ....... however I thought some might find the following collections of thoughts to be interesting ...... the question of ... "In your opinion, what qualities should a hero always have?" was posed and more than 100 romance authors have given their answers ...... A Hero at Heart
~~ KatherineT ~~ I'm a Harlequin Addict, and I'm proud of it!
~~ Quiet Canadians ~ 2008 Book Challenge Blog
Oh wow,
I love this discussion. By definition the hero of a romance (I believe, anyway) needs to be heroic. It's not enough to be a main character. That simply makes him a protagonist.
It all comes down to motivation. The rake who settles down isn't changing his spots. He's meeting a heroine whom he loves and feels secure in her feelings for him...so much so that he lets go of whatever has led him to his profligate behavior. Does that make sense?
I'm thinking of Julianne MacLean's Surrender to a Scoundrel. The hero was supposedly a womanizer and reckless. Turns out he wasn't at all, but he was hiding pain behind his actions. He was witty and charming and driven, which made me like him despite his reputation. And even when the heroine had proof of his behaviour. Then, as they got to know each other better, he confides in her his true pain and I agonized with him. It explained everything. The world still believed him a cad. She knew what hid behind the facade.
This is a perfect example of a woman "saving" a man, the way so many women want to...that whole "He's different with me" thing. It is just a lot safer to do it in the pages of a novel rather than attempt it in real life. It is part of the allure in my opinion.
Heroes have to have redeemable qualities, otherwise they become the fixer-uppers that Vince is talking about.
My 2 cents,
Donna
FALLING FOR MR DARK AND DANGEROUS, Romance, August 08, Aus/NZ Sept. 08
THE RANCHER'S RUNAWAY PRINCESS, Romance, January 09
http://www.donnaalward.com
http://www.donnaalward.blogspot.com
One clarification.
Hi KatherineT:
I visited the thread on Alpha males and converted it to a Word document so I could enlarge the type. Everyone interested should check this out because it is essentially a 150 page book on Alpha males. Great stuff.
From what I’ve read so far I am getting the feeling that you are not referring to the biological definition of Alpha male, as would be used in a wolf pack, but you have your own romance definition which is evolving and is essentially a “working definition” used in the community for which it has meaning. In essence is an Alpha Male what the romance community says he is? And is there no authority to check to see if someone’s assertions about Alpha Males are true?
Thanks,
Vince
“Romances are the emotional vitamins of the soul.” Vince
Alpa heroes and all that
I'm here!
Katherine asked me to come over and join in but I'm going to have to dash in, apologise and dash out again - I am on a screaming tight dreadline (spelling deliberate) and I have just seen how much there is to read here and I'm not sure I have enough time to catch up fully.
So I'll just say a couple of things - and FF has heard them all before!
Alpha in a romance really only truly should mean alpha as in Alpha wolf etc where the Alpha is the leader of the pack, the strongest - and best - of the male species. The name has been taken over, messed about with (can I say bastardised - in all senses?
) and made to be shorthand in some romance cirlces for bullying, domineering, graceless and unpleasant 'heroes'.
Not in my book (when I'm talking about how to write romance in the 12 Point Guide ) or in my books when I'm writing them.
A hero is an alpha hero when he is like the alpha wolf strong, powerful, successful, etc etc - In many ways he is that strong and that powerful because he then acts as a challenge to the heroine who proves her strength and courage by standing up to him - and when as Exective editor Tessa Shapcott says - when he is 'the ultimate nurturer'. He must also always have a core of honour or he is - in my mind - no hero.
Any actions he takes that seem domineering, forceful etcd etc must only be done with the very best intentions in mind and working from that core of honour and believeing that he is doing what is right and what is best. His heroine may not see it that way or he may be acting on insufficient information and so he might not have all the facts at his disposal but he should be acting from that core of belief in honour and doing right.
Then it's down to the author to convince you that he has good reasons for what he is doing. If she, writing the book, doesn;t convince you then that man will never be a hero to you (yes FF? ) but it is not because he is an Alpha that he is like that., If he's a bully, he's a bully, end of story and the author hasnt convinced you - it's not that he's an Alpha that makes him a bully. (One day FF I'll get yo to agree
)
Vince- and anyone else - I'm so glad you've [ickedup on the Alpha Male discussion - it says so much more than I have time to say here. And if you have any questions at the end I'd be glad to come back to this topic. When I have more time.
I'm also going to hunt out and c&p a reply I made some time ago when someone talked about 'taming' the hero in a romance novel - I really just don;t see it that way and I wouldn't ever want to. To me taming means reducing the hero - or whatever or whoever is tamed - to a lesser level - I would never want to see a tame tiger for example and I'd never believe in it ever ebing really 'tame'.
Anyway, I'll hunt that out and post it.
Thanks to Katherine for doing a great job of talking about the Presents hero. I'm not going to say defending because when the book is written right and read right then he doesn't need defending. Sometimes readers bring so much of themselves to a book (yes FF I'm talkign about you!
) that they can't really see what the author has actually written but instead their own interpretation of it.
Oh - and The Italian's Stolen Wife isn't my book - mine's The Italian's Forced Bride - and all I'm saying is that you're going to have to read that book if you want to believe the title and that 'Forced' word !
Kate
http://www.kate-walker.com
Spanish Billionaire, Innocent Wife - Presents June 2008
The Alcolar Family - 3 in 1 ebook bundle June 2008
Bedded By The Greek Billionaire Presents October 2008
12 Point Guide To Writing Romance
'Taming' heroes
OK - I found my previous comments on this. So I've cut &pasted it.
I'll try to come back and see how the discussion is going - but please don't tell my editor that I've been here.
Taming a man huh?? Now tell me - who in her right mind would want a 'tame' man??? Isn't that the point of romance - that the heroes are often larger than life, sometimes even wild and potentially dangerous but the HEA means that they meet a woman who is not afraid to contend with that wildness in order to show that the guy has another side to him. Many heroes I've read of in romances are essentially still the same person at the end, they just have this loving part of them that has grown and the need for love met by their heroines. A Love Story can have a story of living and learning and loving - but not end up with that HEA. After all, wasn't that the essence of the book 'Love Story' - where the heroine dies in the end so there nothing happy about that - but it is as it's title says a 'love story'. But the romance story does tend to centre round the conflict and the resolution of it. Quite often the H&h are already in love but either they won't admit it or they can't admit it or they daren't admit it - or they just plain don't realise it. A love story can, like N Sparks own The Notebook can simply be a story of heartfelt devotion where conflict has very little to do with it.
The ending of a romance is not with anyone 'tamed' or 'grovelling' ( how I hate that word!) but with the conflict resolved so that the h&H can really see each other for the people they really are and they feel free to be the people they really are with this special person who brings out the very best of them. In fact, the best romance end with both characters becoming the best they can be as a result of love. The man can still be as Alpha as can be - brave, determined, powerful etc etc but he is also totally Alpha in his love. That is strong and brave and true as well. As the wonderful Michelle Reid once said:
The Alpha Man must have an Achilles heel. And our guy’s Achilles heel is love itself. For me, there is nothing more important in a Presents novel than to feel his vulnerability to the heroine grow the deeper he falls in love with her. It might make him tetchy, more arrogant - impossible on occasions, but it also makes him human, more likely to stumble on his pedestal and therefore more reachable and easier to love.
Once our Alpha Man accepts he's found the love of his life he's willing to fight to the death for her. When he discovers he is loved by return he is not too proud to say so. In fact he becomes so comfortable with it he's happy to let the whole world know that he's been well and truly hooked. Finding the love of his life completes his Alpha-maleness instead of diminishing it in any way.
Vince I hope you do enjoy that discussion on the Alpha male - the Alpha is a much misunderstood - and perhaps sometimes a much mis-written character in romance!
Kate
http://www.kate-walker.com
Spanish Billionaire, Innocent Wife - Presents June 2008
The Alcolar Family - 3 in 1 ebook bundle June 2008
Bedded By The Greek Billionaire Presents October 2008
12 Point Guide To Writing Romance
Hi Kate!
I did say: I will probably never like what I call an alpha hero, despite the wise words of Kate Walker, who writes some of the better ones.
Just so you know!
EDIT: Kate, I've just had an epiphany. It must be because I'm cynical that I don't buy the alpha's conversion, and keep waiting for them to reurn to type. You, my dear, must be an optimist, which would explain why you think he can be won over permanently.
"Perhaps what the average member of a group is capable of doesn't limit what a given individual can accomplish." -- Boston Globe, letter to the editor
March's Member of the Month!
FF
That epiphany - yes - i'd buyu that! It's what I just said - it'#s what you bring to the reading of the book that colours your view. Your cynicism means you can't believe, no matter how well the author writes it or how much evidence there is of a real change of heart
It's like they say about god - or ghosts! - for those who believe no proof is necessary - for those who don;t believe no proof is possible.
But I'll acknowledge that there are some books where the author has failed to convince me that the hero (or it can just as well be the hero) doesn;t have enough motivatin for their behaviour at the start and so I'll never believe, no matter how much going donw on bended knees and declaring love, that it will ever work out. It has to be convincing within the terms of the novel. And it has to convince the individual reader. And we all read things differently depending on what our lives make us bring to the reading.
But to be honest, FF - if I've ever gone any way towards convincing you with any of my heroes and to make you say they are some of the better ones, then I consider that a great compliment because I know how hard you are to please.
Kate
http://www.kate-walker.com
Spanish Billionaire, Innocent Wife - Presents June 2008
The Alcolar Family - 3 in 1 ebook bundle June 2008
Bedded By The Greek Billionaire Presents October 2008
12 Point Guide To Writing Romance
Hi Kate!
It's so nice to see you! .... thank you so much for your kind words .... I'm always afraid I'll express myself poorly and only make a mess of things! LOL
I wanted to mention first, that I was quoting Emma Darcy's "The Italian's Stolen Bride" as an example to Vince on how those scenes unfolded for me ... as an example of "how" I read a book ... I believe he reads a book much differently than I do and this has often created opposing view points
thank you also for copying your comments about the "taming" of a hero ..... that's like "fixing" him ... I like my heroes with their imperfections .... though I do very much feel the heroine can provide emotional healing, and help her hero to become whole again .... or help him to grow and be a better man ..... I've never really viewed this as "taming" or "fixing" .... the line from the movie "As Good as it Gets" when Jack Nicholson tells Helen Hunt that "You make me want to be a better man" .... oh wow .... that's romance! ... I love it when a heroine brings out those desires in the hero
the joy of reading romance is the knowledge that these wonderful characters will be worthy and find their HEA together .... romances are a very "positive" genre ... uplifting
so FF, yes ... you are cynical .... I was about to say that in an earlier reply to you, but was rather tired and decided to bite my tongue in case I ended up inserting my foot in my mouth .... it's not good to be me when I'm tired LOL
however, yes .... as romances are the type of love story that always have a satisfying ending, I can't possibly envision a hero having negative core qualities .... both hero and heroine must have "heroic" qualities
Vince, you were wondering if there was an authority to check to see if someone's assertions about Alpha males are true ..... I think that as we are discussing the the Presents Alpha hero, that the Exectutive Editor of that line, Tessa Shapcott would be one of the ultimate authorities ... and I also think that the long established authors of the line that have been asked to conduct discussions specifically about the Presents alpha by Harlequin, can also be considered an authority ..... you are of course entitled to your own views on this ... or perhaps you may wish to ask your question directly to the Editors over on the UK M&B Club - Q&A thread
~~ KatherineT ~~ I'm a Harlequin Addict, and I'm proud of it!
~~ Quiet Canadians ~ 2008 Book Challenge Blog
Must We see what’s behind our eyes?
Hi All:
I am most interested in the concept of the “Alpha male” in itself and not as a character definition in any particular romance line. The Presents editors can define what they want to see in their “Alpha Male” characters but that does not define the “Alpha male” for the rest of us. In one sense, we don’t get to decide what words mean unless we coin them ourselves. We don’t want to be like Humpty Dumpty.
'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less.' -- Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass
The Chinese have a saying: “We see what’s behind our eyes.” The very observation that a reader may see in a story what that reader’s experience expects her to see, is itself subject to the same rule: that is, that the observer of the reader may see in that reader’s behavior what “her” experience expects her to see in that reader. Perhaps a cynic? N’est pas?
(Ce qui n'est pas clair n'est pas français ) LOL
I plan to read the whole “Alpha Male” hero thread by Kate Walker. I particularly like Kate’s comment that “the Alpha is a much misunderstood - and perhaps sometimes a much mis-written character in romance!” I am very happy to read this as I have been having problems for over a year trying to nail down just what everyone means by “Alpha male”. The dispute seems very much like a theology dispute where people know they right but can’t prove it to anyone of a different opinion.
Kate: I immediately downloaded and started reading your “The Italian’s Forced Bride”. Won’t you admit, at least, that Presents’ titles are like throwing gasoline on the fire of people who are not Alpha hero fans? (Cf. “forced,” “bartered,” “blackmailed,” “at the command,” and “at the bidding of”)
Thanks,
Vince
“Romances are the emotional vitamins of the soul.” Vince
No. I am not a typical
No. I am not a typical romance reader and I read many more genres than romance so I tend to read for the story, not just the romance. Actually the last think I want to read about it a fixer up hero. A hero who has past hurts or is a wounded soul can be nice if it is well done. But a woman changing a man, no. In real life that leads to much unhappiness...like the non-alcoholic who thinks they can make the alcoholic stop drinking...it just doesn't work. I actually find it quite irritating when the heroine tries to change the hero or talk him into some change.... if there is a change that happends from within him then I buy it ut talking a hero into change..no way and it's not romantic either.
AKA Merri
Family Challenge Team: The Spine Breakers with my dh Glenn AKA Phaedrus
I know how hard you are to please.
Me? Hard to please? Perish the thought!
"Perhaps what the average member of a group is capable of doesn't limit what a given individual can accomplish." -- Boston Globe, letter to the editor
March's Member of the Month!
Vince . . .
Firstly - thak you for getting a copy of The Italian's Forced Bride and I eally hope that you enjoy it . It's a book that has a had a lot of success both in the UK and USA and it sold at #1 on Waldenbooks bestseller list when it came out.
Oh dear, you don't make it easy for me to stay away and not keep joining in the discussion - just don't tell my editor I was chatting when she comes after me with her whip
>> won’t you admit, at least, that Presents’ titles are like throwing gasoline on the fire of people who are not Alpha hero fans? (Cf. “forced,” “bartered,” “blackmailed,” “at the command,” and “at the bidding of”)
OK, I'm going to have to say yes and no to answer this.
Let me explain -
Yes, those titles sound provocative and somewhat shocking - taken, bartered, forced etc are extremely emotive words and they are deliberately used in that way. So yes, if you go by the sort of definition that FF has - and the one that I constantly fight against when discussin the Alpha hero - that the ALpha male is too forceful, too domineering, arrogant beyond belief, and close to being a bully, then I do agree that those sorts of titles could just inf