So I've been working on my latest WIP, trying to find humor and fun,
and I think I've done that, but I still don't have the character's
voice down yet. The plot is fine, and the laughs are there, but not in
HER voice. I still hear me, and that won't work. I need to find her.
She's a little Daria but a little more Willow from season 1 Buffy. At
least that's how I see her when I close my eyes.
I haven't picked
up the latest in the Twilight series, but I did spend the weekend
reading Stephenie Myers interviews. DANG is she amazing. Melissa Marr
won the YA Rita for Wicked Lovely. It's a well deserved award. Until
recently Marr was my 8th grade niece's current favorite. Wicked Lovely
was unseated recently by Libba Bray. I'm hearing young girls everywhere
talking about Bray's Gemma Doyle series. DD actually read the first, A
Great and Terrible Beauty, when it came out. The library featured it
that summer. Then DD went to high school and forgot about the book
until recently. This summer, she caught up, and she's LOVED it. When I
go back to school, I hope to bring the series with me. I might have to
keep it on my desk instead of in the bookshelf. From what I've heard so
far, I think it will be in high demand.
A Great and Terrible Beauty:
It’s
1895, and after the suicide of her mother, 16-year-old Gemma Doyle is
shipped off from the life she knows in India to Spence, a proper
boarding school in England. Lonely, guilt-ridden, and prone to visions
of the future that have an uncomfortable habit of coming true, Gemma’s
reception there is a chilly one. To make things worse, she’s been
followed by a mysterious young Indian man, a man sent to watch her. But
why? What is her destiny? And what will her entanglement with Spence’s
most powerful girls—and their foray into the spiritual world—lead to?
Rebel Angels
Gemma
Doyle is looking forward to a holiday from Spence Academy—spending time
with her friends in the city, attending balls in fancy gowns with
plunging necklines, and dallying with the handsome Lord Denby. Yet amid
these distractions, her visions intensify—visions of three girls
dressed in white, to whom something horrific has happened that only the
realms can explain.
The lure is strong, and soon Gemma, Felicity,
and Ann are turning flowers into butterflies in the enchanted world
that Gemma takes them to. To the girls' great joy, their beloved Pippa
is there as well, eager to complete their circle of friendship.
But
all is not well in the realms—or out. Kartik is back, desperately
insisting to Gemma that she must bind the magic, lest colossal disaster
befall her. Gemma is willing to comply, for this would bring her
face-to-face with her late mother's greatest friend, now Gemma's
foe—Circe. Until Circe is destroyed, Gemma cannot live out her destiny.
But finding Circe proves a most perilous task. . . .
This sumptuous companion to
Great and Terrible Beauty teems with Victorian thrills and chills that
play out against the rich backdrop of 1895 London, a place of shadows
and light . . . where inside great beauty can lie a rebel angel.
The Sweet Far Thing
It has been a year of change since Gemma Doyle
arrived at the foreboding Spence Academy. Her mother murdered, her father a laudanum
addict, Gemma has relied on an unsuspected strength and has discovered
an ability to travel to an enchanted world called the Realms, where
dark magic runs wild. Despite certain peril, Gemma has bound the magic
to herself and forged unlikely new alliances. Now, as Gemma approaches
her London debut
, the time has come to test these bonds.The
Order—the mysterious group her mother was once part of—is grappling for
control of the Realms, as is the Rakshana. Spence's burned East Wing is
being rebuilt, but why now? Gemma and her friends see Pippa
,but she is not the same. And their friendship faces its gravest trial
as Gemma must decide once and for all what role she is meant for.
**Above book info from Google search and Wikipedia
Header Promotion











I really enjoyed the first
I really enjoyed the first two books of the Gemma Doyle series. The third is in my TBR, but I haven't gotten there yet. I'm been on a thriller/suspense kick, so I haven't really been that interested in the paranormal aspects of the Gemma Doyle series.
Among my students, I'm careful about who I recommend the series to. Some parents can be freaky about the what their teens read. However, I know several of my girls who have enjoyed it on my recommendation.
J
Parents
J,
My daughter said the school could never have it on a required reading list, but she said she learned a TON from reading the books. I've never had a problem from parents, but I can see where this subject matter could lead to problems. We did have a parent complain about Harry Potter at the grade school level. Our latest book scandal: a parent, an educator demanded we remove To Kill a Mockingbird from the required reading list for freshmen because he said it was racist. Thank GOD I didn't have to sit in on these meetings. There's no telling what I would've said. The result: that teacher no longer has to teach the book. Those kids sure are missing out, and it's a shame that teacher totally missed the point of the book.
The first year I taught
The first year I taught Mockingbird, I have a parent complain about it, but when I asked her if she had read it, she admitted she had not. She just knew that it used the "n" word. I asked her to read it before I gave her daughter an alternate assignment. She became one of the biggest proponents of the book in the community. (Seriously, it is difficult to imagine that anyone could have a problem with Atticus Finch, but I know some people do).
When I taught at a different district, we had a parent complain about Fahrenheit 451, and last year a teacher on my team had a parent complain about The Giver. Yeesch!
I find it very sad when people miss the point of truly great books--or in the case of The Giver last year--focus on one minute detail and overlook all of the really wonderful things in the book. I've never had any real problems with the literature that I teach in class, and hopefully my luck will hold.
When I taught HS, I might have kept the Gemma Doyle series and just loaned to girls whose parents I knew would be reasonable about it. (I did that with The Color Purple). Now, however, I have seventh graders and those two words can't even be found in a sentence with the word reasonable.
I used to pass YA literature that I enjoyed but didn't feel I could keep in my classroom to a friend's daughter. However, she is starting college this year, so I don't know that that will be the case any longer. I'm not sure who I am going to share with now.
J
Seventh graders
How FUN! I keep thinking I'd like to teach junior high language arts one day, but I LOVE advising yearbook and newspaper so much, and I love the 9-12 kids, so I don't know if I'll ever make the move.
I really don't think the techer who complained could've read Mockingbbird, but he said he did. I can't imagine a parent complaining about The Giver. I read it for the first time this year, and from now on, I'll have it as required reading for my staffs if they haven't read it already. It's easier than 1984 and Brave New World but gives a lot of the same messages.
My DD is going away to college this year, so I know what you mean about the YAs. For years we've traded books, and that's going to stop for awhile now. I'll have to rely on my students.
The parent in question did
The parent in question did not like the dream that Jonas had about Fiona. Uh, hello--isn't that a normal part of growing up? Plus, it added to the emphasis that the book put on needing emotions. Some people just have interesting hot buttons.
I had a hard time adjusting to the middle school thing. Last year was my first time with the little buggers, and I had a very hard group. I am hoping that this year is better.
J