Trust in Summer Madness by Carole Mortimer (HP 669)

Janet85
Format: Print Books

Back Cover:

This man should have been her husband

Jarrett King had walked out on Sian three years before, breaking their engagement and leaving her devastated. Now he was back, expecting her to come to him.

He had a wife. He was dating Sian's sister. He claimed to be in love with Sian. What sort of man was he?

And what sort of woman was she, she wondered, that a week before her marriage to another man she could still feel such a passion for Jarrett?


Spoiler Warning: All my reviews contain spoilers to some degree  


Favourite Scene:

Jarrett stood up, at once seeming predatory, and Sian took a wary step backwards. His mouth twisted derisively. ‘I never needed to use force on you, Sian,’ he drawled mockingly.
‘You would now,’ she snapped.
‘If I were interested,’ he watched with satisfaction as she paled, ‘and I am,’ he added softly. ‘I telephoned you earlier tonight, as soon as I got to town, but you weren’t at home,’ he told her huskily, suddenly very near, the heat of his body, the seduction of his aftershave, reaching out to her.
Sian refused to look at him. ‘Why on earth would you telephone me?’ she asked jerkily.
Suddenly he was more than just close, he was dangerously so, the lean length of his body curving into the back of her as his arms came about her waist and pulled her into him. ‘Guess,’ he murmured throatily against her earlobe.  


My Review:

The H/h were engaged three years ago until the heroine caught the hero kissing his ex-lover (or current lover? she thought so) at his stag party.  It was an off-in-private, cosy little corner, his shirt is unbuttoned halfway to his waist kind of kiss.  Naturally she jumped to conclusions.  Unnaturally, the hero refused to explain himself and wanted the heroine to trust him implicity.  He left the country with the ex-lover and was actually surprised three years later to learn everyone in town had no faith in his fidelity either, everyone assumed he'd ditched her for the ex.  Hero was a dummy not to explain. 

Hero was hypocritical to go off for three years, always planning to eventually come back to her and claim her as his bride once she "matured enough to trust him".  (slap to the hero)  While all those years, he had multiple lovers himself, pretending they were all her, and then he came home and demanded to know whether she'd let her NEW fiance make love to her, he was jealous and possessive and hypocritical. 

Nice little moment of intimacy, the first time Jarrett sees Sian again, he clasps her wrist as she walks by, stopping her and telling her they need to talk.  He warns her he isn't going to stand by and let her marry another man.  When Jarrett sees her new fiance kissing her, he reacts with a glacial jealousy (which was nice) and goes off and kisses her sister (not so nice, but he did warn the heroine he'd seduce/date her sister until she came back to him).  It's sweet that he goes ahead and starts building the house they'd dreamed of building three years ago (for their future family) while he still has yet to win her away from her fiance. 

No fidelity during the three year separation, which I didn't like because the issue that drove them apart was her suspecting he couldn't do without variety: he kissed another woman at his stag party years ago.  It would have been more meaningful for him to have not slept with other women, he told her that for the entire three years he always intended to come back for her, but got kept busy with business.  (not busy enough to keep him from a social life apparently)   Carole Mortimer is one of my "safe authors" who I could always count on for a fidelity read, so I was disappointed here, I thought I could expect fidelity, especially when I thoroughly skimmed and read a passage where the hero was telling the heroine there'd been "no one else" (which he later said he meant "no one but women that I used and pretended were you"... ICK!).     

My Rating: 2.5/5 stars, I'm totally punishing it for the hypocrisy in the hero insisting on her fidelity to their love while having other lovers and thinking he can walk back into her life and take it over whenever he wanted.  Fidelity on the hero's part would have made it an unhypocritical and faithful love.  

Main Characters has Major Flaws

Thank you for the review, Janet.  I am sorry that you are disappointed.  For once, the blurb really delivered. 

You are very generous.  When I don't like the main characters, H or h, I couldn't rate the story.  When they have major personality flaws, it would extremely difficult for me to enjoy the story.

I totally agree with you, infidelity, Big No No.  Maybe 'forgiveness & trust' were the message the author's trying to relay.  Or, maybe this story should not be in the HP/HR/HMR series, seems that the H was not suitable in this series. 

Don't get me wrong, I like CM too.  Maybe she wanted to break out to another style, but the editor put the story in this series by mistake.

Orchid

Orchid

Orchid...  you know,

Orchid...  you know, I don't see it really so much as a "personality flaw"...  so much as "poorly, problematically constructed".  Fidelity after a broken engagement from three years ago?  Most people wouldn't expect that.  BUT when CM went and built up the hero as never having LET GO of his dream of marrying the heroine.... then it's highly problematic and hypocritical for him to have been having other women.  If we're supposed to believe he's committed to it being "her only" for him, that's not the way to do it. 

If we're supposed to believe the major conflict was that the heroine was too young back then to TRUST the hero's fidelity... well, three years of him being able to easily replace her and use women as if they were her...  doesn't prove the point that he's capable of the fidelity she questioned years ago. 

PROBLEMATIC.  It doesn't fit. 

 

Granted...  note this book is in the 600s...  not the 2600s... it's a very old HP. 

 

I totally agree with you, infidelity, Big No No.  Maybe 'forgiveness & trust' were the message the author's trying to relay.

Exactly.  Didn't fit the message the author was sending.  And having sex with other women while you still have every reason to be tied to your heroine... is a very sour point for me.  Spoils my enjoyment.  And I do feel like I'm being too harsh and too sensitive when it comes to fidelity, so that's why I try not to "punish the author" in the rating for my personal beef. 

Or, maybe this story should not be in the HP/HR/HMR series, seems that the H was not suitable in this series. 

What do you mean it's not suitable to this series?  Really, I've seen heroes behave worse.  This didn't seem out of character for an HP player hero.  But it seemed like the kind of hero CM wouldn't write. 

 

Don't get me wrong, I like CM too.  Maybe she wanted to break out to another style, but the editor put the story in this series by mistake.

This was one of the earlier HP books, and CM has written much more books after this date than prior to this date. 

Maybe her editor was cheesed that CM was putting unrealistic idealistic fidelity in too many of her books?  And asked for CM to try writing a hero that isn't castrated and doesn't lose his sex drive without the heroine?   I can see that. 

 

 

Not a horrible book as far as any HP goes.... but for a girl with a fidelity complex, my hypocrisy alarm went off in a bad way.

Oh btw...  I have a CM book

Oh btw...  I have a CM book in hand as we speak and I'm loving it.   I read it back in 2005 but I'd almost forgot the plotline entirely, so it seems new to me again and it's a good passionate read.  "Claiming his Christmas Bride"...   good times.

I read this years ago!

Janet, I know that I read this years ago -- I remember the part about him building their 'dream house.'  I also didn't like that he 'used' her sister.  If he always wanted the heroine and then 'played' with her sister -- what if the sister fell in love -- he would have hurt her badly.

I can't remember his eventual explanation of what happened as the stag party?  Why was he kissing another woman with his shirt all undone?  Regardless of age, any woman would be suspicious in those circumstances.

Lidia

Hey Lidia...  the

Hey Lidia...  the explanation wasn't that great.  Nina asked him for a "good luck kiss" and then kissed him.  It was kind of implied that Nina set them up.  The heroine told him that Nina told her they were still lovers, and the hero emphatically denied it and said Nina was lying.  The shirt wasn't explained.   But really.... 

as you said...  ANY frigging woman would react badly to her man getting a long kiss from his recent ex-lover (it was a matter of short months). 

The heroine's lack of trust in his fidelity was BLAMED as the reason for their failed relationship three years ago... which was totally unfair.  The hero should have apologized for thinking her childish and refusing to explain to her.  Because he wasted years by letting his pride say "I'm not going to reassure my fiancee and let her know that I'm not still sleeping with the woman I was sleeping with before her.  Naturally she deserves an explanation because unless I'm a totally dumb ass, I understand that it looked bad." 

Syndicate content